- About Us
- Chess Improvement
- Chess Puzzles
- Chess Research
- College Chess
- General News
- Home
- Major Tournaments
- News
- Polgar Events
- Privacy Policy
- Scholastic Chess
- SPICE / Webster
- Susan’s Personal Blog
- Track your order
- USA Chess
- Videos
- Women’s Chess
- Contact Us
- Daily News
- My Account
- Terms & Conditions
- Privacy Policy
Aronian and Kramnik would be more interesting if the match was longer. But since it’s only 6 games and it’s not the world championship, Anand-Gelfand wins by a small edge.
Anand – Gelfand definetely, as Kramnik – Aronian is just a friendly.
Classical chess time control isn’t interesting whoever playing.
naka vs Hou would be interesting but I would back Naka since he must be having Gary’s ideas still
Anand – Gelfand will be more exciting.
AS is trolling.
I’m not trolling. Who want spend 4 hours watching chess games without blunders? you can compare it with Formula One race without accidents. Whoever making good start win the race.
Boring game! Everybody want to know who is the winner in the end, but nobody care to follow it.
I was watching WC Blitz 2009 and it’s far more interesting. Not even close.
no matter who plays world championship match is always exciting than any other friendly match. World championship is big event and there is tension behind every move and game. It will not only test skill but also the mental strenth of the players