Q: How do you feel about college chess and tournament chess?
A: I strongly believe that college chess is a critical bridge between scholastic and adult chess. If we can successfully promote college chess, we will retain many more scholastic players and transition them to adult chess. Otherwise, our USCF adult membership will continue to decline and our sport will be in big trouble.
I have mixed feelings about the various types of tournaments. Many players of all levels enjoy the competition. However, if I were an amateur player, I am not sure that I would spend up to $400 for entry fees, plus another $1,000 in expenses, to play in a tournament with very little chances of recouping the money. I prefer other types of tournaments.
I think club, local and state tournaments are just as fun and very good for chess. If I want to have the feel of big time competition by playing alongside grandmasters, I believe an event like the annual National Open in Las Vegas would be ideal. This has the feel a big Swiss event. However, the entry fees, meals and hotel costs are very reasonable and there are plenty of free side events, such as lectures and game analysis, etc. There are also tons of other fun and exciting things done by the organizers.
Chess as a sport has plenty of room to grow. But all types of chess such as scholastic, college, adult, correspondence, Internet or military chess must co-exist. Therefore, it is vital that we must find the right formula to help our sport grow.
Q: What is going on with the USCF election?
I decided to run in this election because I owe it to my sport to make things better. The USCF is in bad shape. It has been run for years as an amateur hobby organization. We have board members who micro-manage and make political policies, instead of sound business policies in the best interest of the game.
It is operated very inefficiently and there is too much waste. The problem is that many board members do not have the expertise or experience that is needed. The USCF has lost millions of dollars in recent years and it has lost money in nine of the last eleven years. In any normal company, every single board member would have been dismissed long ago.
I am hoping to make serious changes to help US chess and the USCF. I have some of the most qualified people willing to help me, including my husband, who is a premier chess marketing, promotion and PR person in the United States. Several other professionals such as Dr. Mikhail Korenman (an incredible chess organizer and promoter for scholastic, college, adult and professional players) and Randy Bauer (a very experienced and successful financial person) are also willing to help.
I am willing to work with every qualified person for the best interest of chess and the USCF. I welcome the cooperation of other chess leaders. But I am not willing to compromise my personal integrity and the welfare of this federation. The best interest of chess should always come first, before personal interests and accolades.
If I win, I expect to be able to help US chess and the USCF a great deal. But I need a strong team with the right experience and expertise and that is why I recommended Mikhail (Korenman), Paul (Truong) and Randy (Bauer).
Q: What are some of the changes that you would like to see within the USCF?
a) Improve its respectability, integrity, efficiency, professionalism, image and reputation.
b) Set up a state of the art marketing, promotion and PR system to help bring in additional revenues and sponsorships.
c) Establish a sound and balanced budget to ensure the viability of the entire federation.
d) Increase the cooperation and support for adult, scholastic, collegiate, correspondence and military chess, which in turn will raise the membership level and lead to more revenue.
e) End chess politics and make every decision based on what is in the best interest of chess and the federation and not for political reasons.
Q: What is your short and long term vision for the USCF if you are elected?
This is an excellent question. There must be short and long term goals for this federation to succeed. Here are the twelve critical areas that must be improved in order for the USCF to grow and prosper.
1. Building a strong membership base via grassroots marketing, promotion and strong structural support for the local clubs, affiliates, organizers, volunteers and supporters. We need to develop a high level of mutual respect and cooperation among these groups.
2. Building a strong membership recruitment plan with excellent incentives for organizations to partner with us. There are more active players who are not members of the USCF than there are USCF members. Many of these players do not see the benefits for joining the USCF. This has to change. We must get our message out much better. We must also work with our partners to offer our members and potential members more value and greater benefit for their money.
3. Building a strong support system for scholastic, college, adult, tournament, correspondence, Internet and professional players. As we have seen over the years, adult and college chess suffers from the lack of a cohesive plan to retain scholastic players. We must also recognize that there are many more Internet players than ever before, but we cannot ignore our correspondence or professional players. It is vital to the health of this federation that we have communication and joint effort between all of these membership groups.
4. Building a strong and respectable image and reputation for the USCF. Without this, we cannot get support from the private sector or local, state, or federal government. Any of these agencies and organizations can do a background check on the USCF and this is the chief reason why we keep losing one sponsor after another. We cannot have incompetent and unprofessional people leading this federation. We need to bring in people with proper experience, expertise, energy and passion for chess along with strong records of success.
5. Building a strong, sensible and cost sensitive marketing, promotion and PR project. It does not have to cost tens of thousands of dollars to be effective. I have proven that with the Susan Polgar Foundation. It can be done if we know how. Too many people are bickering about dollars and cents while throwing away opportunities to increase revenues through sponsorships, grants and other avenues.
6. Building a sound and fiscally responsible budget with minimal waste. The savings from the inefficiency alone can fund many additional projects to help the USCF. We must build the USCF into a viable organization. This federation is not running at an optimal level right now.
7. Building a strong relationship and partnership with countless other chess organizations nationwide and worldwide. We need to unite to win. Constant political wars and infighting will only harm chess and the USCF. As a leading federation in the world of chess, we should lead by example and work with everyone to better our sport.
8. Building a strong relationship and partnership with countless volunteers and supporters to help improve many current weaknesses of this federation. There are plenty of people who are willing, ready and able to help, but they are not being utilized properly because of chess politics.
9. Building a strong relationship and partnership with kindergarten, elementary, middle and high schools, as well as colleges and universities across the country to promote chess and education. We also have to work with parents of home-schooled students, in addition to organizations that represent them.
10. Building a strong relationship and partnership with countless companies around the world to promote chess and all its benefits. They want to promote their companies, products or services and we want their sponsorship. It is a win-win situation for both sides.
11. Building a strong communication channel with all members, volunteers, supporters and sponsors, etc. We need to get our strong and positive message out to the people.
12. Building a strong business vision and plan. We need to run this federation like any successful and reputable company. All business decisions must make sense financially or help this federation in one way or another. We cannot make business decisions as a way to reward our political supporters.
We have the numbers and strength to be a competitive and viable organization. All we need is to take advantage of the opportunities and change our approach to running this federation. Instead of saying why it cannot be done, we have to be willing to sit down and figure out what it would take to make things happen for the best interest of chess and the USCF. Just as in a chess game, we must be able to maximize every single advantage and improve every weakness.
But the most important thing is to vote! Let your voice be heard! Together, we can turn around this federation and build it into a strong and viable organization!
More questions and answers can be found here.
Foreigners are not allowed to become US Presidents. They should not be allowed to run for the USCF Executive Board either. The USCF should be run by Americans who understand America. We must keep women and foreigners out of the USCF. I support Sam Sloan, Jim Berry, Joe Lux and Don Schultz. President Goichberg agrees with 3 of my choices too.
So what if the USCF lost money? Nothing will change no matter who’s elected as long as Goichberg is in control. His #1 priority is his CCA. Why should he care about the finances of the USCF?
A few years ago, Don Schultz was pushing a deal for the USCF to pay $1.5 million to buy CCA from Bill Goichberg. Now Goichber wants Joe Lux (who works for Goichberg) and others like him to win the election. It’s wonderful to have friends like this, isn’t it?
Did Goichberg disclose to the USCF members that Joe Lux is on his payroll? Doesn’t he think that the USCF members should know this?
This is one of the examples of the way how Goichberg operates. He’ll do anything to destroy people even if he has to lie and deceive them. This is why Dubeck wants to destroy him. Dubeck wants good things for the USCF.
Why don’t you guys go back to the USCF forums to spam? Go join Goichberg, Schultz, Lux and Sloan over there.
Susan wrote: “9. Building a strong relationship and partnership with kindergarten, elementary, middle and high schools, as well as colleges and universities”.
I’m so glad to hear this. The benefits of teaching kids chess are many – besides teaching the critical thinking skills, professionalism, etc., we must not forget that they’re the future USCF. Some might say they are the neglected present USCF!
I believe that all of us, as USCF members, must contribute towards establishing a larger presence in our elementary, middle, and high schools, particularly in remote, rural areas, where Chess is almost unheard of. There is so much room for improvement!
“Foreigners are not allowed to become US Presidents.”
This may change, too, one day.
I absolutely agree with the recommendations by USCF President Bill Goichberg. Vote Americans! Vote for Schultz, Lux, Jones and Berry! This is the US Chess Federation, not the United Nations.
I voted for Susan and her team. The USCF needs serious changes. It has been ruined by the hands of Goichberg and Schultz for too long.
I think there is a culture of mediocrity at the USCF and that is one of the reasons why those in power and those who are now ruling the USCF issues forum are so hostile to Susan. They are a very uninspiring and unimaginative bunch of people. They are threatened by Susan and Paul and their new ideas. I think that they encourage the scholastic vs. adult name calling because it keeps everyone divided and that lets them hold on to power.
Just this morning, Brenan Nierman posted this anti-Polgar diatribe on the USCF issues forum: “Polgar will have been elected because of her celebrity; because for the life of me I cannot name one definitive position she has taken on anything, other than smearing her political opposition with unfounded allegations.” Dear Mr. Nierman: Your animosity to GM Polgar has apparently interfered with either your eyesight or reading ability. Go to the Chess Cafe column and you will read twelve definitive positions which are succinctly stated and which give a very clear view of her positions on issues of critical importance to the USCF.
It always makes me laugh when Chess is called a ‘sport’. Get over it people. It’s a GAME.
“We must keep women…out of the USCF.”
Who is this mike A-H?
And why is this convicted kidnapper/felon Sloan sending rambling yellow postcards to my house with pictures of his wife (is it?) and his daughter? What a psycho sleezebag…I voted for Susan and her team. We need a change
“We must keep women…out of the USCF.”
Who is this mike A-H?
And why is this convicted kidnapper/felon Sloan sending rambling yellow postcards to my house with pictures of his wife (is it?) and his daughter? What a psycho sleezebag…I voted for Susan and her team. We need a change
Why do I think a lot of the “anonymous” posts are from the same person, acting like a sock-puppet and pretending to be different people?
All I can say is that I wish Susan would move to Canada and run for the leadership of the CFC. For that matter, if she wins the USCF election (which I absolutely hope comes to pass), she can annex the CFC and put their house in order too! haha.
The slanderous posts are increasing in both audacity and absurdity and are increasingly frequent… must be a sign that the opposition is worried and the clock is ticking and their flag is about to FALL.