- About Us
- Chess Improvement
- Chess Puzzles
- Chess Research
- College Chess
- General News
- Home
- Major Tournaments
- News
- Polgar Events
- Privacy Policy
- Scholastic Chess
- SPICE / Webster
- Susan’s Personal Blog
- Track your order
- USA Chess
- Videos
- Women’s Chess
- Contact Us
- Daily News
- My Account
- Terms & Conditions
- Privacy Policy
boards and foidos software did not work. dgt and vladimir kramnik ended up misleading public. what an embarrassments.
http://www.chessvibes.com/
online-chess/dgt-projects-world-
premiere-foidos-kramnik-plays-
werle-sebag/
Who designed the playing area? Vladimir Klitchko?
lol@Wild’s post.
right on the spot!
but you can’t deny that’s the kind of inventive we need to move chess forward.
What was the results ?
How interesting. Chessbase – a champion of controversy is not reporting true facts, that Foidos failed to work, but only deceiving info: http://www.chessbase.com/
newsdetail.asp?newsid=4551
If Peter from Chessvibes was not there, we would not have the truth. Sending out announcement to hundreds of chess sites, confirming a premiere demonstration of something that does not even function, under Chessbase cover-up is a real masquerade, and mismanagement of both – chessbase and dgt.
Drawnik can’t beat people his own size and so he picks weaker players to beat so as to shrug off the Drawmaster label… nice
Actually, only one human being (Anand) is currently higher rated than Kramnik.
As I don’t believe that it was Anand who posted the comment at 06 Apr 6:56 PM there is obviously somebody much much lower rated than Kramnik who thinks he can use the anonymity of this blog to insult one of the current leading chessmasters and “the man who beat Kasparov”.
I recommend a study of Kramniks games. He is simply a great player; and performing at this level in chess while simultaneously fighting a vicious desease (Arthritis) is an outstanding and admirable achievement.
BTW Kramnik takes on the No.1 in chess later this year in a fight for the World Championship. So… apart from the out-of-place insult even the facts given in the comment by Anonymous at 6Apr 6:56PM
are simply wrong.