– How long did the negotiations last?
…We are under pressure to continue the match with a score of 3-1 for Kramnik. We cannot accept this because we were there and followed the procedure. We submitted an appeal. The Appeals Committee and the referees studied the videotapes and came to the conclusion that there was enough evidence to rise suspicion. We had meetings with Kirsan Ilyumzhinov and Vladimir Kramnik. Kramnik was very arrogant.

– What do you mean by “arrogant?”
– He is convinced that he has political backing. He behaved like a man who knew that everybody does what he tells them to.

– What does Topalov think?
– He wants to play but he is shocked by Kramnik’s behavior because he is impudent and constantly insults him. He always offers draws and does everything to make Topalov nervous.

The full article can be read here.

Unfortunately, this is the kind of talk that will only make things worse. Even if Danailov feels that Kramnik insulted Topalov, there is no need to trade each blow. This has to be cut down. Otherwise, the match will end.
 Posted by Picasa

Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
Tags: