Susan Polgar
October 9, 2009
Daily News, General News, SPICE / Webster, Susan's Personal Blog
11 Comments
- About Us
- Chess Improvement
- Chess Puzzles
- Chess Research
- College Chess
- General News
- Home
- Major Tournaments
- News
- Polgar Events
- Privacy Policy
- Scholastic Chess
- SPICE / Webster
- Susan’s Personal Blog
- Track your order
- USA Chess
- Videos
- Women’s Chess
- Contact Us
- Daily News
- My Account
- Terms & Conditions
- Privacy Policy
Go Ben!
did that World Open really take 4 years to complete?
Yes, it was a correspondence tournament.
Or maybe just one of many bad arbiters or federation’s reports, that will now fail because of beaurocratic error.
Isn’t it supposed to be by perfomance rating to get norm? Not by points, as before, not valid any more?
A strange report with errors all over the place. Who made it?
“A strange report with errors all over the place. Who made it?”
Where is your GM report Anonymouse?
I bet Krackerjack made yours if you have one.
‘I bet Krackerjack made yours if you have one.’
Who is Krackerjack?
“Where is your GM report Anonymouse?”
http://ratings.fide.com/
title_applications.phtml?
details=1&id=6300634&title=GM&pb=24
http://ratings.fide.com/
crt/main219143.pdf
The real report (which is not the one from the photo) is even “funnier”.
“The United State of America” (??)
“Level of Highest Rating” (?)
etc.
If I had the power, and I do not, I would fire the author of that template and replace with an automaton.
‘The following federation’ is really a gem.
‘Isn’t it supposed to be by perfomance rating to get norm? Not by points, as before, not valid any more?’
Yup, but FIDE doesn’t know this well kept secret yet.
Round 7 Nanjing Report:
I’ll start with a correction requested by the Chief Arbiter Ignatius Leong regarding a previous round report. He advised that the GM norm and IM norms are subject to performance ratings of 2600+ and 2450+ and not to the old system of categories.