- About Us
- Chess Improvement
- Chess Puzzles
- Chess Research
- College Chess
- General News
- Home
- Major Tournaments
- News
- Polgar Events
- Privacy Policy
- Scholastic Chess
- SPICE / Webster
- Susan’s Personal Blog
- Track your order
- USA Chess
- Videos
- Women’s Chess
- Contact Us
- Daily News
- My Account
- Terms & Conditions
- Privacy Policy
1.RN8+ RxR
2.NB7#
We were using the word “combination” for such set of moves involving sacrifice.However I have not come across that word for years.Has it been obsolete? Do we now simply call it “tactic”.
Rg8+ RxRg8
Nf7#
Not quite 5 seconds for me- took me about 10-15 seconds to spot it. The rook at f8 is trying to do too much by guarding both f7 and g8.
1. Rg8! Rg8
2. Nf7#
Good one!
1.Rg8+.Rxg8.2.Nf7#!
1. Rg8+ Rxg8 2. Nf7#
Yeesh, I didn’t solve this one at all. It shows you (or at least it showed me) again the practical value of trying a different move order if your initial idea doesn’t work. Of course I looked at Nf7+ and noticed to my dismay that deflecting the Rook (f8) away from the back rank wasn’t enough to crash through. The pattern in the solution should be recognizable enough without having to rely on such a ponderous, plodding, mechanical thought process as “try a different move order”; but when you can’t play chess the way you should, you have to make use of what practical advice you can.
Incidentally I think this game might’ve been an important game at the time in the opening theory of the Benoni Defense.
– Craigaroo
Craigaroo,
Since your idea was to deflect the R at f8 you should have tried to deflect it to g8.Your first idea would have worked without R at a8.