Would any candidates care to post or repost what they consider to be the 3 most important things they would like to achieve for the USCF and how they would attempt to achieve them? I’m pretty sure we have seen some of this and if you don’t want to post again, that’s fine. Just an opportunity to keep your ideas fresh in your minds and ours.
Here is the answer from FM Paul Truong:
1. Create Fiscally Responsible, Sound and Balanced Budget as well as Effective Spending: It is ridiculous that the USCF keeps on losing money. This is not acceptable. We need results, not excuses. I have proven that we do not need to overspend to achieve results. We just need to pay attention to the details and be willing to self evaluate what works and what does not work and improve things immediately. The current system simply does not work. The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. We need to stop wasteful spending. We cannot continue the tax and spend strategy. We need to be much more conservative with our budget and money.
2. Create and Implement Effective Marketing, PR and Promotion: This will potentially help increase memberships, revenues and sponsorships. It does not make sense to keep on fighting about a dollar here and there while there is a large untouched market out there. The big problem is not the dues. The big problem is many do not feel that they are getting their money’s worth. While we do have many things to offer, how can everyone know if we don’t tell them? Most people cannot even find information on the website.
3. Reach out to the Local Affiliates, State Chapters and Volunteer Base to create and maintain a strong support and relationship with membership groups such as adult, scholastic, collegiate, correspondence, military and internet chess. We are not utilizing and doing enough to maximize our support groups. Many want and can help. All these membership groups will affect each other in the future.
For example: Scholastic –> Youth –> College –> Adult (correspondence or military and many are interested in email or Internet chess regardless of the age, etc.) We need to partner up with others such as ICC, FICS, WCN, ChessGames, ChessMail, and PlayChess, etc. We can do non-exclusive co-promotional agreements which will not cost us a penny but will bring us incredible results. This way, the drop off rate will be minimized and the revenues will increase.
And in all three of the areas above, the board MUST MUST MUST conduct themselves with respectability, integrity, credibility and professionalism.
I read the statements from all the candidates and I’ve decided to vote for Ms. Polgar, Mr. Truong, Mr. Bauer and Mr. Korenman.
What have Mr. Jones do for chess recently? Little if any.
What have Mr. Goodall do for chess lately? Little if any. He also has health issues in the past.
What have Mr. Schultz and Sloan do for the USCF lately? The USCF lost money again and these gentlemen should step out and let others do a more efficient job.
I like Mr. Berry and I wish I have 5 votes. He would be my 5th choice.
I like Mr. Lux too and he’s my 6th choice.
Just my 2 cents!
PT has come up with a very interesting statement. I wonder about one thing. Many people (okay, since people post annonymously “many people” may = just one person posting many times) – Many people have commented on this blog, ostensibly in support of Susan and her team, against the Exec. Board “micromanaging” the USCF. My question is: how is Paul and Susan supposed to get things done if they can’t micromanage?
It seems to me that if they do the things they wish to accomplish, then they will have to open themselves up to attacks of “micromanaging”.
I suggest that a better thing would be for our side to ease up on the “micromanaging” criticisms so that Susan and Paul can do their jobs when they get elected.
Schultz is a real idiot as evidenced by the propaganda he distributed at the recent FOXWOODS tournament. He really believs there is nothing wrong with the current state of affairs and is calling to keep the status quo.
What a putz.
Get rid of the MONROI. It is a great tool, but really only for cheaters. And stop cutting shady backroom deals and you’ll do just fine when you win.