St. Louis International Matches – GM Nakamura vs. GM Ponomariov
This year’s 2011 St. Louis International Match features the world’s #5 player Hikaru Nakamura (USA, 2774) versus the world’s #8 Ruslan Ponomariov (UKR, 2754) as well as 16 year-old GM Ray Robson (USA, 2522) Vs GM Ben Finegold (USA 2494). It’s an interesting exhibition match system, with a total of 10 games (6 classical time control, followed by 4 rapid time control games). As the classical portion of the match ended on May 22nd, Nakamura leads Ponomariov 3.5-2.5 and Robson leads 4-2 against Finegold.
This article is an abbreviated version of the Will’s article. Please visit Will’s site for the full version of Will’s article on the Hikaru Nakamura vs Ruslan Ponomariov St. Louis Chess Matches which includes full PGN’s and extra content.
GM Nakamura vs. GM Ponomariov, 2 of the best blitz players in the world
I have especially enjoyed the heavyweight match, as Nakamura looks to build world-class experience against Ponomariov, who won the FIDE World Chess Championship in 2002 in a knockout match format. Ponomariov displayed excellent endgame technique to take down game #1. However, Nakamura made a fine opening adjustment to even the score in game 3 in a complicated King’s Indian Defense. The St. Louis resident went on to achieve a very fine positional victory against Ponomariov’s slightly inaccurate defense in Game 6, taking the lead going into the rapid portion of the match. While Ponomariov is a tough rapid/blitz chess he’s still no match for Nakamura who is one of the best blitz players in chess history. My prediction for the final score of the ten game match is Nakamura – 6.5 to Ponomariov – 3.5.
Chess Video – GM Ruslan Ponomariov vs. GM Hikaru Nakamura – Game #3
Game Description: 2011 St. Louis International Match: Game 3 – GM Hikaru Nakamura (USA, 2774) Vs GM Ruslan Ponomariov (UKR, 2754) – Ponomariov opens with d4 and is answered by Nakamura’s King’s Indian Defense. In game 1, Nakamura lost by playing a line that involved 7. Nc6 and a long-term kingside attack with a later f5 and f4. However, in this game he went a different direction with 7. Na6 – looking for more play in the center as opposed to kingside expansion. Ponomariov played an interesting pawn sacrifice with 12. c5, however I believe it is objectively unsound as black is able to consolidate his position with an extra pawn and the 2 bishops. Nakamura showed some fantastic endgame technique, as he transformed his advantage of a pawn to winning an exchange, then sacrificing the exchange back to obtain a favorable Q+P endgame which he went on to convert in convincing fashion.
Chess Video – GM Hikaru Nakamura vs. GM Ruslan Ponomariov – Game #6
Game Description: 2011 St. Louis International Match: GM Hikaru Nakamura (USA, 2774) Vs GM Ruslan Ponomariov (UKR, 2754) – Nakamura opens with the Queen’s Gambit as white, and deviates early from their game 4 line by playing 6. Qc2 instead of 6. e3. Ponomariov initiates an early queen trade with 8. …Qg6, which leads to a slight worsening of his position due to the cost of time and therefore space. Nakamura engages in subtle positional maneuvering which slowly builds a pressing advantage, as Ponomariov fails to sense the growing danger and continues making natural consolidating moves. 21. Rac1! marks the turning point in the game, as black’s pieces are simply too tied up to defend against white’s creeping attack. An excellent positional victory by Nakamura, not permitting the slightest counter-play by his former world champion opponent.
Thanks for reading, what are your opinions on the tournament?
By William Stewart. William offers more content as well as Chess Classes and Tutoring on his website. Please check his site out.
Nakamura is of course better than Anand, Kramnik, and Topalov.
That videos are kind of basic for my taste. Can Will provide deeper analysis, not all are 1600 rated here….
It’s just right for my level. I like it. Keep up the good work. Most of us are under 1600 you know.
The level is perfect.
I think there are many people here over 1600 ELO.
🙂
Stef
Hello guys,
Thank you for all the kind comments! Since starting up my chess tutoring business 4 months ago I’ve experimented with various levels of analysis. I started off doing deeper analysis (see my first 3 videos on Amber that we’re 30-40 minutes long) we’re 2 parts and we’re and had MANY people on YouTube complained that I was too advanced so I tried to make it a more (but not too) simple level.
It’s very tough to make chess videos that will please everybody. I try to make the videos at a “intermediate” level so that the majority of people can enjoy.
As a 2200 player I enjoy advanced analysis myself (such as those of Danielsen Henrik, and Maurice Ashley), but they are very advanced and about 60-70 minutes per game.
I look at it like this if you want VERY simple 5-10 analysis of recent games you can go to to YouTube channels such as: Kingscrusher, jrobichess, thechessnetwork, the chesswebsite etc etc
If you want very ADVANCED analysis you can always go to Henrik and Ashley
My goal is to provide the missing gap up 15-20 minute Intermediate level analysis that 1500-2000 level players can enjoy, and that 1200-1500 players can understand.
Fact is less than 1% of chess players are even above 2000 so I need to try to please everybody.
Perhaps in the future I’ll do a “advanced” series on occasion that will be a well thought out 30-40 minute video, specifically be for Chess Experts and Masters.
Thanks for your comments
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE send me any criticism or ideas to will@onlinechesslessons.net
Regards, NM Will Stewart
Will, I’m enjoying your analysis! In game 6, rather than white’s Rf6, I’m wondering if Bxf6 would’ve been sound?