1. Polgar 1386
2 . Bauer 1087
3. Truong 949
4. Berry 915
5. Korenman 757
6. Jones 733
7. Schultz 711
8. Lux 465
9. Sloan 263
10. Goodall 190
The top 3 will have a 4 year term and the 4th finisher will have a 2 year term.
The number of ballots received as of 9AM this morning was 4513, but that does not yet include Wednesday’s mail.
States counted so far:
Region 1: Maine Region 2: none Region 3: Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, DC, W Virginia Region 4: Florida, N Carolina, S Carolina Region 5: Michigan, Indiana, Ohio Region 6: S Dakota Region 7: Missouri, Nebraska Region 8: Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana Region 9: Utah Region 10: Oklahoma, Texas, N Mexico Region 11: Nevada, Hawaii Region 12: Idaho, Washington, Oregon, Alaska.
States not yet counted: NH, VT, CT, RI, MA, NY, NJ, PA, GA, ND, SD, WI, MN, IL, IA, WY, CO, KS, AZ, CA
As I said many times before, we have 7 qualified candidates in this election. Anyone in the current top 7 can help the USCF and I would be happy and proud to work with them. However, a lot of positive changes have to be made in order for the USCF to survive and prosper.
Some of these areas are:
1. Building a strong membership base via grassroots marketing, promotion and strong structural support for the local clubs, affiliates, organizers, volunteers and supporters. We need to develop a high level of mutual respect and cooperation among these groups.
2. Building a strong membership recruitment plan with excellent incentives for organizations to partner with us. There are more active players who are not members of the USCF than there are USCF members. Many of these players do not see the benefits for joining the USCF. This has to change. We must get our message out much better. We must also work with our partners to offer our members and potential members more value and greater benefit for their money.
3. Building a strong support system for scholastic, college, adult, tournament, correspondence, Internet and professional players. As we have seen over the years, adult and college chess suffers from the lack of a cohesive plan to retain scholastic players. We must also recognize that there are many more Internet players than ever before, but we cannot ignore our correspondence or professional players. It is vital to the health of this federation that we have communication and joint effort between all of these membership groups.
4. Building a strong and respectable image and reputation for the USCF. Without this, we cannot get support from the private sector or local, state, or federal government. Any of these agencies and organizations can do a background check on the USCF and this is the chief reason why we keep losing one sponsor after another. We cannot have incompetent and unprofessional people leading this federation. We need to bring in people with proper experience, expertise, energy and passion for chess along with strong records of success.
5. Building a strong, sensible and cost sensitive marketing, promotion and PR project. It does not have to cost tens of thousands of dollars to be effective. I have proven that with the Susan Polgar Foundation. It can be done if we know how. Too many people are bickering about dollars and cents while throwing away opportunities to increase revenues through sponsorships, grants and other avenues.
6. Building a sound and fiscally responsible budget with minimal waste. The savings from the inefficiency alone can fund many additional projects to help the USCF. We must build the USCF into a viable organization. This federation is not running at an optimal level right now.
7. Building a strong relationship and partnership with countless other chess organizations nationwide and worldwide. We need to unite to win. Constant political wars and infighting will only harm chess and the USCF. As a leading federation in the world of chess, we should lead by example and work with everyone to better our sport.
8. Building a strong relationship and partnership with countless volunteers and supporters to help improve many current weaknesses of this federation. There are plenty of people who are willing, ready and able to help, but they are not being utilized properly because of chess politics.
9. Building a strong relationship and partnership with kindergarten, elementary, middle and high schools, as well as colleges and universities across the country to promote chess and education. We also have to work with parents of home-schooled students, in addition to organizations that represent them.
10. Building a strong relationship and partnership with countless companies around the world to promote chess and all its benefits. They want to promote their companies, products or services and we want their sponsorship. It is a win-win situation for both sides.
11. Building a strong communication channel with all members, volunteers, supporters and sponsors, etc. We need to get our strong and positive message out to the people.
12. Building a strong business vision and plan. We need to run this federation like any successful and reputable company. All business decisions must make sense financially or help this federation in one way or another. We cannot make business decisions as a way to reward our political supporters.
We cannot continue to function as an unprofessional organization which chases away sponsors, supporters, volunteers and members year after year due to incompetence and destructive politics. Please continue to support the USCF. This is just the first step. Together, we will raise this sinking ship. I am looking forward to many exciting years ahead of us.
Thank you for your support!
Susan Polgar
So you have 3/4 of your slate on the committee for 2 years, with an option for P Truong to stand again in 2009. Not bad.
I’m surprised that PT didn’t score higher, what with the visibility he got here. Maybe voters reckoned that they would get PT as part of the SP-PT team anyway. Maybe it was the reticence about the CV.
Anyway, it’s time to show some good co-working with the others on the Exec.
I don’t think so. She got 4/5. She always endorsed Berry as they’re good friends. This is great news for the USCF. I’m sad for Korenman.
Congratulations! Great day for the USCF and US Chess!
In spite the fact that Goichberg and his thugs lied about you and Paul and attacking you every day, the members saw through their dirty tactics and voted you in anyway. Shame on Goichberg! He owes you a public apology.
I agree! Any of the top 7 is fine. No Lux, Sloan and Goodall.
Unless a miracle happens, looks like Mr. Sloan will not be back on the board. I’m sure he will run again though.
First of all, congrats to Susan for her result! My question:
Is there any reason to believe that the states not yet counted (among them NY and CA) might have voted significantly different?
Anyhow, good luck with your plans in the next 4 years.
Listen, I’m happy with the results so far and I agree that any of the current top seven would be great but it is still early. Although I can’t imagine voting for him, I know that Lux claimed to have gotten a lot of support in New York/New Jersey and Jones (who I didn’t vote for but who seems like a reasonable candidate) presumably got a lot of support in California. So let’s hope that the trends continue and we get 4 of the Polgar 5.
Err – the blogpost has been changed after these comments have been added 🙂
Wait until CA votes come in. I have 32 votes coming in for Susan’s Team!
I wish
I hope congratulations are in order; but I dare not jinx the result… 🙂
Please make your first act the annexation of Canada – or at least the Chess Federation of Canada – we can use some help… hehe
I wish!!!
Well done Susan, I was hoping that (despite the dismal return of possible votes) you and the new team would be voted in. A good day in USCF history indeed, to finally have the leadership it has sorely needed for many decades. Well done!
Congratulations from me, too! A great day for the USCF and US Chess! The sun will shine again.
Good first day for our team. I’m still troubled by the low overall vote count. Also, some states where people had been campaigning heavily against Susan and her team have not yet been counted.
Let’s not celebrate too early.
P.S. Sloan is already hollering that the election was rigged! (Grin!)
We also need somebody who can give credibility to the USCF around the world. FIDE hates us and we lost all bids in the past many years.
Wyoming is still not in, so I wouldn’t get to excited yet about these good results.
Looking good folks. Stay tuned.
Dear GM Polgar,
Congradulations on the turn out and vote for your team! I’m proud of you and your team and am confident that with your team in command, integrity and honesty will revitalize the USCF.
Once elected, you’ll have a lot to work on. You mentioned (last month, I think) that you wanted to improve Correspondence chess within the USCF. I’m a big supporter of CC especialy for our troops overseas. It means a lot to so many.
The one issue I hope can be addressed is the topic of USCF Correspondence chess and computer cheating. Currently, there are rules on the book against the use of computers to generate moves but are never…absolutely never enforced.
I hope during your 4 year tenure that your team can address this issue of USCF CC play and that dept’s tolerance of blatent computer cheating. It must be stopped or simply get rid of the entire CC department. Why? Well, if many of the CC players are just using Rybka to choose their moves (which is the current state of affairs) then it isn’t a true “chess match” but just computer vs computer.
A person can send in a game that shows one’s opponent’s moves matched perfecty with Rybka for 50-60 moves. This either must be adressed or get rid of CC which, if the entire Correspondence chess dept. was eliminated it would not hurt very many people since the “no computer assistance” rule is completely ignored.
Please consider this. Cheating is cheating be it OTB or CC play. It’s easy to prove and is against USCF rules…just never enforced by the the current CC Director.
Please help bring honesty and integrity back to correspondence chess within the USCF. This methodof play brings happiness to so many (the elderly, disabled, and others who just can’t travel to OTB tournaments but still enjoy chess and should be given a fair chance to win and not have to worry about playing Rybka rather than a human).
Just something I hope your team can consider at the approprate time even if its 3 years from now.
Thank you, GM Polgar, for your hard work and soon-to-be victory in the election.
Sincerely,
Tim Harris
To Jack Le Moine:
I accidentally stumbled upon your blog today. It is quite extensive. I wonder, though, after all the work you have obviously put into it…why on earth has not a single person ever, ever, ever responded to one of your posts?
it seems odd, indeed. Just wondering.
If these results hold up, this is indeed great news. I’ve been afraid that a low turnout would mean a return of the Ancien Regime. Glad to see I’m likely wrong. 🙂
I’m stunned that there are 200+ people in the world who would vote for Sloan, but there’s no accounting for taste. And I’m sure he’ll be filing suit soon, anyway. :/
Low turnout in elections seems to be the stanard for the US. Look at your local for city posts, congressmen and senators. It pretty pathetic and shows a lot of apathy. I am used to super turnouts where I am from (less than 90% is considered a failure).
Sincerely,
Dr. Karlsson
P. S. Congrats Susan and company
Susan,
I hope you consider running for EB President. Although this will be your first year, you are no stranger when it comes to promoting chess.
I live in the southest part of America, in Buenos Aires City, but this news made me so happy. For Chess and for You. I wish you the best Susan.
THANKS for what you are doing !
Sebastian Schereschevsky
Good winds always and godspeed.A serious professional chess mind for a duty that absolutely must require a serious chess professional. Jude Acers/ New Orleans, Louisiana