Moiseenko and Navara reminded the world about the FAIR PLAY
Press release № 11
September 4, Khanty-Mansiysk
The second day of the 3rd Round of the World Chess Cup in Khanty-Mansiysk finished in an unexpected way. After six-hour-matches there was only one game played in the emptied tournament hall: David Navara (Czech Republic) was implementing the decisive material advantage (queen vs rook) against Alexander Moiseenko (Ukraine). Having beaten down the desperate resistance of the opponent, Navara achieved the position where either mate or the loss of the rook was inevitable and at that moment he offered a draw. The situation was clarified by both grandmasters.
David Navara: – On the 35th move I accidentally touched both pieces – the king and the bishop. I wanted to move my bishop on d6, but clipped the king also, however, Moiseenko insists that I have first touched the king, but I am not sure about that. Any move with the king would lead to the loss of the piece, however, Moiseenko did not insist that I make my move namely with it. I did not want to be referred as to the unethical chess player who managed to win in an unfair way, that is why at the end, having achieved the winning position, I offered a draw.
Alexander Moiseenko: – Navara on the 35th move first touched the king. I told him: the king moves. However, I realized that my opponent accidentally made this mistake, it is not possible that he could so easily blunder the piece. This is the reason I did not insist on his move with the king.
Let us remind you that if you are knocked out in the 3rd round you get 12800 dollars, and the qualification for the 4th one guarantees you the minimum prize of 20 000 dollars. Besides, the winner of this match will continue fighting for three tickets to the World Championship.
The extraordinary situation was commented by our expert – Grandmaster Sergey Shipov:
– I think that both opponents acted in an extremely honorable way. Today, in these difficult times, our heroes are risking the qualification to the next round, which means jeopardizing serious money for the sake of preserving their reputation.
The first noble move was made by Moiseenko, who forgave an accidental touch of a piece made by his opponent. After that Navara decided that he has no moral right to win this game and made a noble gesture in return – he offered a draw in an absolute winning position. I think our world is not hopeless while we have people like David Navara and Alexander Moiseenko. I personally will support these two Grandmasters in all further rounds. Unfortunately one of them will have to leave after the tie breaks.
This story came to knowledge of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Ugra Governor. Natalia Komarova declared on her decision to establish a special prize of the World Cup – “Fair play”:
– No doubt that the whole world will highly appreciate the mutually noble deed of the Ukrai-nian and Czech chess players. We go for nobility, at the chess board as well as in the everyday life.
– I am very proud of both sportsmen who acted in accordance with FIDE logo: Gens Una Su-mus, – summed up the FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov.
Official website: http://chess.ugrasport.com
You can check the official broadcast here around 16:02 to see what really happened. I’m sorry, but I don’t understand for what should Moiseenko recieve the fair play prize… Or is it joke?
Navara is one of the most polite, likeable and honest grandmasters and I hope he will win the tiebreak.
Moiseenko fair play? He was trying to cheat Navara, however, when Navara decided to call the arbiter, then Moiseenko didn’t give any importance to the incident and let Navara move whatever he wants. Just the normal thing, as the video shows he never tried to touch any other piece but the bishop.
Moiseenko was just trying to fool Navara
I just checked it out. Navara touches the king, slides his hand over then moves the bishop. I will post pics.
It is perfectly logical to give the prize to both. It was on black’s 34th move.. the king and queen were so close.. it could have been that his fingures glided ober the king before moving to queen. In the resulting confusion he even forgot queen vs rook ending!!
It was the conflict of guilt and greed but ultimately conscience won!
From official broadcast around 16:02:
1. http://i53.tinypic.com/2iscr9e.jpg
2. http://i53.tinypic.com/iyouab.jpg
3. http://i52.tinypic.com/fa0psn.jpg
4. http://i56.tinypic.com/16mlnp.jpg
5. http://i54.tinypic.com/fxqe7t.jpg
6. http://i53.tinypic.com/dym1c0.jpg
Navara reached for the king, touched it, realized his mistake and moved the bishop.
It is cruel or even criminal to charge Navara for any accidental touch (if at all he did) as he is autistic. Surely Moiseenko knows this?
Has there been allegations of cheating or arbiter corruption in this tournament?
‘Surely Moiseenko knows this?’
Moiseenko is a not a good person.