PAIRINGS FOR ROUND 4
Tb | Res | White | Res | Black |
1 | TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY – A (2628 3.0) | WEBSTER UNIVERSITY – A (2746 3.0) | ||
2 | U OF TX – RIO GRANDE VALLEY – A (2672 3.0) | UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS – DALLAS – B (2572 3.0) | ||
3 | WEBSTER UNIVERSITY – B (2604 3.0) | SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY (2651 3.0) | ||
4 | COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY – A (2361 2.5) | UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO – A (2244 2.5) | ||
5 | UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS – DALLAS – A (2610 2.5) | U OF TX – RIO GRANDE VALLEY – B (2484 2.0) | ||
6 | UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS – A (2171 2.0) | UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS – DALLAS – C (2500 2.0) | ||
7 | UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN – A (2455 2.0) | DUKE UNIVERSITY (2168 2.0) | ||
8 | ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY (2118 2.0) | WEBSTER UNIVERSITY – C (2451 2.0) | ||
9 | COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY – B (2068 2.0) | U OF MARYLAND – BALTIMORE – A (2354 2.0) | ||
10 | CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY (2313 2.0) | UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS – AUSTIN – A (2048 2.0) | ||
11 | UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH (2205 2.0) | RUTGERS UNIVERSITY (1995 2.0) | ||
12 | OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY – A (2004 2.0) | TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY – B (2199 2.0) | ||
13 | WEBSTER UNIVERSITY – D (2172 2.0) | PRINCETON UNIVERSITY (1862 2.0) | ||
14 | UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS – B (1974 2.0) | WASHINGTON U – ST LOUIS – A (2171 2.0) | ||
15 | UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO – A (2240 1.5) | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (2110 1.5) | ||
16 | UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS – AUSTIN – B (1860 1.5) | UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO – B (1973 1.0) | ||
17 | TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY – C (2156 1.0) | CLEMSON UNIVERSITY (1722 1.0) | ||
18 | U OF MARYLAND – BALTIMORE – B (1705 1.0) | UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN – B (1797 1.0) | ||
19 | U OF MINNESOTA – TWIN CITIES – A (1882 1.0) | UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS – C (1656 1.0) | ||
20 | WASHINGTON U – ST LOUIS – B (1372 1.0) | U OF TX – RIO GRANDE VALLEY – C (1915 1.0) | ||
21 | OBERLIN COLLEGE – A (1896 1.0) | U OF CENTRAL FLORIDA – A (1567 1.0) | ||
22 | OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY – B (1552 1.0) | NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (1882 1.0) | ||
23 | UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA (1869 1.0) | TULANE UNIVERSITY (1490 1.0) | ||
24 | U OF TX – RIO GRANDE VALLEY – D (1613 1.0) | MIAMI-DADE COLLEGE – A (1859 1.0) | ||
25 | UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO – B (1708 1.0) | TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY – D (1617 0.5) | ||
26 | LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY (1506 0.5) | U OF TX – RIO GRANDE VALLEY – E (1346 0.5) | ||
27 | OBERLIN COLLEGE – B (1176 0.5) | UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA (1508 0.5) | ||
28 | MIAMI-DADE COLLEGE – B (1152 0.5) | LONESTAR COLLEGE (unr. 0.5) | ||
29 | U OF CENTRAL FLORIDA – B (847 0.5) | TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY – E (856 0.0) | ||
30 | TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY – KINGSVILLE (908 0.0) | U OF MINNESOTA – TWIN CITIES – B (1449 0.0) |
Thanks!
Susan, how is it possible this tournament is being played with such lack of information. This is incredible. The tournament have remarcable players from all over the world and does not even have a web page with pairings, teams rosters, comments… You and a guy from UTRGV twitting results are the only source of informations. I can beleive it. Take the tournament to Saint Louis and show them how it must be done!
At last!
https://www.chessbomb.com/arena/2016-pan-am-collegiate/