With great surprise we read the announcement of Mr Silvio Danailov on 25 May, accusing the members of the FIDE World Championship Committee as being responsible for the high percentage of …draws(!) in Kazan. A non-chess reader would really wonder whether the members of the World Championship Committee were the ones playing in the Candidates Matches. Once more Mr Danailov shows no respect to the top players, we hope under his competitive capacity of a player’s manager and not that of ECU President.
If it wasn’t for Mr Danailov ‘s dual role as President of ECU and manager of top players, no reply would have been necessary to this incredible announcement, as its content speaks by itself for the poor quality of his arguments. Everybody in professional chess knows very well that if two grandmasters desire during the game to draw it, there is no way to force them not to. FIDE has valuated various ideas in the past (for example the “no draw offer before move 30” or the so called “Sofia rule”) but the truth is that applying such regulations to a World Championship Cycle needs further input from the top players and their national federations. Mr. Danailov should understand that chess players cannot be whipped to dance to his tune, especially those fighting for the World Championship title.
FIDE is in the process of conducting discussions for future improvements on the format of the cycle and the announcement of Mr Danailov came immediately after receiving such a questionnaire (in his capacity as Veselin Topalov’s manager) from FIDE WCOC member Emil Sutovsky. A couple of weeks ago Mr Danailov also announced his intention to run for FIDE President in 2014. Seeing the opportunity to promote his own political agenda, Mr Danailov abused his position as ECU President and FIDE’s desire for feedback from its top players, to attack through his reply whom he views as “political opponents”, instead of participating constructively in the on-going dialogue for the future World Championship cycles. Mr Danailov has not understood yet that he has been elected to the position of ECU President, with a monthly salary accompanying it, in order to serve all European chess players and not only his future political ambitions in FIDE.
We therefore ask Mr Danailov to participate in the dialogue initiated by the World Championship Committee in a productive manner as nobody else is sharing his rush to connect everything with the FIDE elections in 2014. We also confirm once more that the interests of all top players are protected by FIDE, of course including those of Veselin Topalov.
Best regards,
Georgios Makropoulos
FIDE Deputy President & WCOC Chairman
hear hear!
I agreed with Danailov’s points. That’s how a lot of fans felt. FIDE is so out of touch with modern sports. Are footballers allowed to draw after 10 mins of play? No! They have to play on, the same in any sport, except chess! In the interest of chess, I think Europe should go it’s own way and not be included in FIDE. FIDE don’t care about sponsors or improving the image and popularity of chess. No wonder Carlsen walked!
FIDE is right. You can’t make these players play a certain when this is for the world championship.
Fide is delusional. Although I hardly ever agree with Danilov…in this case he was spot on. It’s not really the players fault either though…it’s the ridiculous format they have to play through.
I’m quite sure that 99.9 percent of the chess world is not satisfied with the format nor the Result of such a crap shoot. It’s no way to pick a deserving challenger. All that being said…congrats to Gelfand. He is following in the footsteps of other (World Champions) that Fide has managed to cobble together in recent years…IE Ponomariov, SHabalov…etc. I’d be willing to bet that a simultanious match between Carlsen, Topalov, Kramnik,Aronian, Radjabov, Ivanchuk..Hell Even Kasparov…etc would all eclipse the WCC coming up. And I’d wager some of those names could command more money from sponsors to boot.That’s not saying much about Fides competency.
Anand is a great player and fully deserving the title at the moment…but Fide could treat him with more respect and have him face someone more “Up to speed” through a more competent qualification cycle.
You can”t blame the players for this mess. They HAD to be careful with only 4 regular games and this format. They were under tremendous strain to not make a mistake, with really noo time to make it up.
The candidates format is to blame for this…not the players. I wish people would just respect that. Gelfand deserved his win as he had the stronger nerves in this “Lottery” So Good for him. The dude is probably playing in his last qualification and it’s sort of nice to see his carreer wind down in such a way. Good for him. The kids have plenty of time. But I long for the old style Candidate matches..interzonals..of the 70’s and 80’s. Somebody at FIDE thought it’d be a good idea to dumb down the process..make it faster (Apparently to attract sponsors..which of course they didn’t) and todays players have no chice t to either play these flawed cycles or else lose out on a decent paycheck. Sad days…for sure. Fide needs an overhaul.
I’m with Danailov on this. FIDE’s response that there is no way to avoid draws is bogus. The history of chess has seen plenty of match play where draws don’t count. Fischer suggested this for 1975. It’s a simple solution regarding draws.
If that is logistically impossible in this day and age then I’d prefer the challenger to come out of a tournament of eight qualifers. Just play double round robin. Someone will win and someone will lose making a drawing strategy less likely to succeed.
What they did at Kazan was not good enough
Chess is so boring without Topalov …
27 draws out of 29 …
apalling …
Someone dig up Campo. He will save us!