Subject: Creative and Effective Curriculum for Improving Math and Science Education
To: President George Bush
February 22, 2006
Math and Chess for America’s Schools Education is one of the single largest state budgetary expenditures. Educating our children and providing them with the necessary tools to become productive citizens is a moral and legal duty of parents and governmental entities. Our nations future depends upon our next generation’s ability to remain globally competetive in the fields of math and science. Yet even with the increased focus we place on education our students still fall below national norms in math scores.
There is an efficient and innovative way to teach our students mathematics. That is by integrating math with the game of chess.Chess has long been considered a way for children to increase their mental prowess, concentration, memory, and analytical skills. To anyone who has known the game, it comes as no surprise that these assumptions were actually proven in several studies on how chess can improve the grades of students.
Although chess has been shown to increase the mental abilities of persons of all ages, the main studies have been done with children. This is first for the obvious reason that students are constantly tested anyway, and therefore the data need only be analyzed, and secondly because children’s mental development is more rapid and can be more easily measured than persons at a later life stage.
Early Conclusions
After several informal studies were done in the early 20th century on the effect that chess has on logical thinking and other such functions, a primary conclusion was drawn that chess does in fact not only demand such characteristics, but develops and promotes them as well. John Artise in Chess and Education wrote “Visual stimuli tend to improve memory more than any other stimuli; chess is definitely an excellent memory exerciser the effects of which are transferable to other subjects where memory is necessary.
“With this in mind, legislation in the U.S. in 1992 promoting and encouraging the incorporation of chess into the curriculum of schools was passed. Funding is available under the “ Educate America Act” (Goals 2000) public law 103-277, section 308.b.2.E. The U.S. joined the more than 30 countries which already had chess included in some form in their school curricula.
In part due to the educational community, which has noted the increased academic performance of students participating in chess, there has been an explosion in the number of children playing chess in the U.S. An estimated 250,000 children in the U.S. are introduced every year through the school system to the basics of the game. Studies have already been done to confirm the hypothesis that chess is linked to increased grades in school.
Case Studies
As reported in Developing Critical Thinking Through Chess, Dr. Robert Ferguson tested students from seventh to ninth grades from the years 1979-1983 as part of the ESEA Title IV-C Explore Program. He found that non-chess students increased their critical thinking skills an average of 4.6% annually, while students who were members of a chess club improved their analytical skills an average of 17.3% annually. Three separate tests to determine how chess affects creative thinking were also done as part of the same study. It concluded that on average, different aspects of creative thinking had improved at a rate two to three times faster for chess playing students, as opposed to their non-chess playing counterparts.
Subsequent studies by Dr. Ferguson further supported these original conclusions. In the Tri-State Area School Pilot Study conducted in 1986 and Development of Reasoning and Memory Through Chess (1987-88) chess playing students showed more rapid increased gains in memory, organizational skills, and logic.
In Zaire the study Chess and Aptitudes, was conducted by Dr. Albert Frank at the Uni Protestant School, during the 1973-74 school year. Using sufficiently large experimental and control groups, Dr. Frank confirmed there was a significant correlation between the ability to play chess well, and spatial, numerical, administrative-directional, and paperwork abilities. The conclusion was that students participating in the chess course show a marked development of their verbal and numerical aptitudes. Furthermore, this was noticed in the majority of chess students and not only those who were better players.
A study conducted in four large elementary schools in Texas in 1997 further demonstrated the positivism of chess. Through the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS), the study was done to test the difference that chess playing had on standardized tests. These schools selected all had a chess program in existence for a minimum of two years. Since a few thousand total students took the test and all types of students were tested from special education students to gifted and talented students, the sample was large and diverse enough to make a concrete conclusion. There were significant improvements in both reading and math for all grade levels and all classes of students (regular, gifted and talented, special education, academically able, etc.). Through the Texas Learning Index, or TLI, it was determined that on average the students who played chess improved in reading and mathematics at a rate between 1.5 and two times faster than non-chess playing students.
In terms of verbal improvement specifically, a study by Dr. Stuart Margulies from 1991 addressed this. Students with higher verbal skills tend to score higher on word problems than their lower performing counterparts. The “Margulies Study” is one of the strongest arguments to finally prove what hundreds of teachers knew all along-chess is a learning tool. (Inside Chess, February 1994).
“Can chess promote earlier intellectual maturation” was the question posed in the Chess and Cognitive Development study directed by Johan Christiaen from the 1974-76 school years in Belgium. The results again clearly confirmed that the group of chess playing students showed significantly more improvement then the non chess playing students. In 1982, Dr. Gerard Dullea mentioned this study and proclaimed “…we have scientific support for what we have known all along-chess makes kids smarter! (Chess Life, November 1982) In a similar study done in a test series in New Brunswick, Canada called Challenging Mathematics, the mathematics curriculum used chess to teach logic from grades 2 to 7. The average problem solving score in the province increased from 62% to 81%.
Conclusions
We can now say with full confidence that chess has been PROVEN to enhance creativity, problem solving, memory, concentration, intellectual maturity, self esteem, and many other abilities that a parent or teacher would desire. We should act now to provide our children with an innovative and exciting approach to learning mathematics: Math and Chess for America’s Schools.
I am currently in discussions with Senator Lamar Alexander’s office of Tennessee and the Tennessee Department of Education regarding just such a program. I look forward to sharing this information with you as well.
Sincerely,
Rob Mitchell
Murfreesboro, TN
What you say is certainly true, except that in the real world, high grades and ability, when all is said and done rarely matters.
What matters most is persona, connections, favors, social ties, alignment, cleverness, ability to think quickly on your feet, deceit, being convincing (right or wrong), blackmale, persona, beauty…
welcome to the REAL world.
More and more, we have global corporations. What that means for many Americans is simply that the top brass in corporate America, when faced with global competition from developing or underdeveloped nations, rely more and more on outsourcing business and jobs from the developed economy within America to these nations, where prevailing wages are low, environmental protection is minimal, and worker’s rights are non-existant–>Thus, the cost of production is lower than in America. Couple this with favorable tarrifs, and bingo! you have corporate leaders who appear brilliant when in fact, they outsourced because they could neither manage their business more effectively or competitvely within America. They COULD-NOT motivate their American workers.
The International corporations headquartered in America realized a side benefit from outsourcing to developing or underdeveloped nations is that they can sell their products there as the economies raise. This still does not change the fact that in most of these developing and underdeveloped nations the lion’s share of benefit goes to a tiny minority of the populace. And the majority of people are thrown a few crumbs, as they say.
Where does this leave the average Joe and Joesephine? In America, it leaves them working in the service industry (instead of the manufacturing industry), where employment is high, yet wages and benefits are much lower than in the manufacturing industry.
What does this mean for Americas’ youth?
Many things, for instance:
1) Hopefully you and your family will be part of a corporate cliche that will find you a paper job which pays your bills.
2) The so-called standard of living in America will shrink further.
3) You are foolish not to get a college education.
4) If a small business owner, work together with other small business owners in your own community to ensure that most of the money in the local pool stays put. This, of course is much easier said than done.
5) Be your own business and sub-contract for other developed economies, as America’s economy is not the only developed economy in the world (Europe and others). Try France and Airbus, for instance. Or, if you believe in taking risks, try Russia. Have a good life insurance policy and lots of money, hint hint.
6) If you’re truly brilliant, i.e. really gifted and know how to apply yourself, this diatribe doesn’t apply to you.
7) Be very good looking, and exploit it for all it’s worth. This becomes easier and easier as time goes by in America. Appearance over substance.
8) Be very good at office politics…after all, clever men and women often really have very little natural ability, yet they know which buttons to push to get what/where they want.
9) Hope that you are very lucky. However, don’t blow your money on the lottery.
10) Play chess every day. Enlist a rich benefactor.
And one last thing, as time goes by, be prepared/look for large swings in your fortune. Sometimes, life truly is a crap shoot.
Still don’t believe me?
Then study this real life case:
Toyota versus America’s big three GM, Ford, and Chrysler. Toyota is having the Big Three for lunch, so to speak.
Toyota even built factories in the USA when the Big Three automakers lobbied effectively for higher tariffs, and is now beating them on their home turf.
What will it take for the Big Three to turn the tables on Toyota et al? Well, to a large extent, the Big Three have already actually applied some of Toyota’s Lean manufacturing strategies in their businesses. However, they are still light years behind in Total Quality Commitment (TQC). The Big Three will never overcome all the nepotism and their other non-Lean Practices. Ever.
What the Big Three automakers just don’t understand about Lean Strategies and TQC, even though it is spelled out in Womack and Joneses’ Lean Thinking, and Suzaki’s The New Manufacturing Challenge, is that Total Quality and Lean Principles must be applied to EVERY layer/facet of an ENTIRE corporation…NO EXCEPTIONS.
One day the Big Three Auto makers in America will be the Big Four: Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Mitsubishi.
Sayonara
P.S. This is only the tip of the iceberg, I didn’t even mention Big Oil and the Middle East…
That letter tells the truth, but unless you can induce Bush that chess will make the richest even richer, he and his administration just ignore it.
I believe in the future. I believe that through hard work and determination that the human spirit cannot be deterred. I have faith thatsomething great may be accomplished.
The Math and Chess curriculum has been proven effective. Why not use a proven effective tool to give all of our children the opportunity to excel?
I have contacted the Governor’s of all 50 States. I have received direct responses from three States already as well as a Congressman and a US Senator and former Secretary of Education.
Meetings are scheduled. It is my job to sell various administration officials on the efficacy for my proposal. Our nation cannot continue on it’s current path without dire consequences. That is why millions of dollars are being proposed to train new math and science teachers.
I think it only wise to take advantage of the timing and use it to our advantage. We have the attention of the government right now. Now is the time we should act and work towards improving our childrens opportunities for a better life. Now is when we should all be advocating Math and Chess for all of our students.
Rob Mitchell
http://www.Worldofchess.blogspot.com
Hi all – I hope this question does not bother anyone – I am trying to find a particular chess set from when I was a kid – the pieces were flat cardboard with arrows drawn on showing which way the piece could move – any idea of where to get such a set? Thanks – Karen