Chess notes
By Harold Dondis and Patrick Wolff
June 20, 2011
If only the Cold War were still going on, we have a chess player who might awaken the consciousness of the nation much as Bobby Fischer did some 30 years ago.
Hikaru Nakamura, now living in St. Louis, has moved to the No. 6 spot among world Grandmasters, and he has a definite star quality in his approach to the game. His family moved here from Japan when he was 2; now he is 23, the stepson of Sunil Weeramantry, one of the foremost US chess coaches. Essentially, however, he is self-taught and self-propelled. Weeramantry noticed that at an early age Nakamura was coming up with unexpected moves, of the type that put his opponents on the defensive. Nakamura has a single assistant, Kris Littlejohn, who is only a rated expert, though schooled in computer matters.
Perhaps we can call Nakamura the James Dean of chess, for his career has been one of unalloyed acceptance of risk and participation in the game to its very boundaries of enjoyment. No one thinks of him as an intellectual, but rather as a pragmatic player who will slug it out with any opponent. He appeared on the Internet early playing blitz and bullet chess, destroying most comers with enthusiasm. He even adopted bizarre moves such as an early queen move in the opening, a no-no in chess theory. Garry Kasparov said his shenanigans at fast chess and questionable openings were a waste of time. It turned out that Nakamura got burned a couple of times with his early queen move. It became apparent that if he were to invade the European redoubts of Grandmaster chess, he would have to feather his sails and he has recently played more sober chess and worked on his end game.
Nakamura moved from New York to St. Louis, where he works under the protection of the philanthropist Rex Sinquefield, who is incidentally building the new headquarters for the World Chess Hall of Fame. There is little doubt that Nakamura has his eye on the world championship. His recent international triumph occurred at Wijk aan Zee, Netherlands, where he came ahead of a field that included world champion Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, and Vladimir Kramnik. Though he took first place, he had no victories against these top players.
One of Nakamura’s recent triumphs was against former FIDE world champion Ruslan Ponomariov in St. Louis. He followed this with a first place in the ICC Open on the Internet, in which 2,216 players competed in various classes. Players were allowed a generous 3 minutes per game. There were 661 players in his qualifying section and Nakamura survived to win a final against eight qualifiers. It catapulted him onto the front page of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Not since Fischer took on the world has this happened.
Source: http://www.boston.com
Kasparov is just jealous of Nakamura, the greatest American player ever. Rex Sinquefield will make him a world champion. No doubt about it. He’ll pass Carlsen in no time.
Nakamura is killing Radjabov. He’ll win Bazna for sure.
I wish I could share your optimism about Nakamura. Carlsen eats his lunch almost every time they play.
He’s definitely among the elite, but is he ready to consistently equal Carlsen, Anand, Topalov and some others…probably not at this point. Maybe never.
Nakamura was coached by his father/step father, one of the greatest coaches in the US, to becoming a great player. So how he can say that Nakamura did it all himself on the computer, “self-taught” is just stupid. He was not self-taught or self-propelled, every good player has motivation.
Kasparov is right. The move 2. Qh5 for example is just objectively wrong because it wastes time. It is a joke, like Nakamura. At least Owen’s Defence may have some theory behind it, but I’m sure you could still prove it as being objectively wrong.
People talk about Nakamura going into crazy situations because he’s playing like a computer. Yeah right. If you play a lot against a computer you avoid tactical complications like the plague and get extremely paranoid about what the other guy might do. This is how I developed playing a chess videogame. Maybe it makes no difference but it doesn’t make your play more wild. Maybe Nakamura is also playing to this stereotype of him.
All of these players like Capablanca and Mir Sultan Khan, supposedly “self-taught” players who apparently learned the game a few days before their successes, in fact it was 100% different if you look into it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
“There were 661 players in his qualifying section and Nakamura survived to win a final against eight qualifiers. It catapulted him onto the front page of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Not since Fischer took on the world has this happened.”
Is this meant to be some kind of joke? This is 3-minute blitz with Nakamura playing people rated far below him and his win was still shaky. The prize for first place was $600! This event made the news because it was the first of its kind, no other reason. Maybe he’s mixing it up with Nakamura’s triumph at Wijk Aan Zee which Kasparov described as being better than Fischer’s best ever performance at any tournament. The ignorance it shows is a bit comical. You can bet that Nakamura wasn’t playing Qh5 at Wijk Aan Zee.
Brute force calculation is really like the manual labour of chess, just testing every move to see if it works, boring, tiring. When you reach a high enough level, it gets more to do with strategy etc. and is vastly more interesting. The fact that Nakamura is going around promoting pure calculation at the highest level is ridiculous.