Round 5 results
- Shakhryar Mamedyarov vs Michael Adams [1-0]
- Loek Van Wely vs Magnus Carlsen [0-1]
- Yi Wei vs Anish Giri [1/2-1/2]
- David Navara vs Wesley So [1/2-1/2]
- Liren Ding vs Sergey Karjakin [1-0]
- Fabiano Caruana vs Yifan Hou [1/2-1/2]
- Evgeny Tomashevsky vs Pavel Eljanov [1/2-1/2]
Standings of Tata Steel Masters 2016 after 5
Score | Rating | TPR | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||
1 | Caruana, F. | 3.5 / 5 | 2787 | 2913 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
2 | Ding, L. | 3.5 / 5 | 2766 | 2900 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
3 | Hou, Y. | 3.0 / 5 | 2673 | 2837 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
4 | So, W. | 3.0 / 5 | 2773 | 2819 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | |||||||||
5 | Carlsen, M. | 3.0 / 5 | 2844 | 2794 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
6 | Eljanov, P. | 3.0 / 5 | 2760 | 2794 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
7 | Karjakin, S. | 2.5 / 5 | 2769 | 2716 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | |||||||||
8 | Wei, Y. | 2.5 / 5 | 2706 | 2775 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
9 | Mamedyarov, S. | 2.5 / 5 | 2747 | 2743 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
10 | Giri, A. | 2.0 / 5 | 2798 | 2680 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
11 | Tomashevsky, E. | 2.0 / 5 | 2728 | 2652 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
12 | Navara, D. | 2.0 / 5 | 2730 | 2694 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
13 | Van Wely, L. | 1.5 / 5 | 2640 | 2621 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
14 | Adams, M. | 1.0 / 5 | 2744 | 2507 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ |
————————————————————————————————
Round 5 challengers’ results
- Samuel Sevian vs Nijat Abasov [1-0]
- Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu vs Benjamin Bok [1/2-1/2]
- Erwin l’Ami vs Mikhail Antipov [0-1]
- Alexey Dreev vs Jorden van Foreest [1/2-1/2]
- Adhiban Baskaran vs Anne Haast [1-0]
- Nino Batsiashvili vs Miguoel Admiraal [1-0]
- Eltaj Safarli vs Wenjun Ju [1/2-1/2]
Standings of Tata Steel Challengers 2016
Score | Rating | TPR | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||
1 | Dreev, A. | 4.5 / 5 | 2644 | 2897 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
2 | Baskaran, A. | 4.5 / 5 | 2653 | 2875 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
3 | Safarli, E. | 3.5 / 5 | 2653 | 2695 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
4 | Nisipeanu, L. | 3.0 / 5 | 2679 | 2605 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | |||||||||
5 | Antipov, M. | 3.0 / 5 | 2567 | 2622 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||
6 | Batsiashvili, N. | 3.0 / 5 | 2485 | 2631 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
7 | Sevian, S. | 2.5 / 5 | 2578 | 2583 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||
8 | van Foreest, J. | 2.5 / 5 | 2541 | 2533 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
9 | l’Ami, E. | 2.5 / 5 | 2627 | 2511 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
10 | Bok, B. | 2.0 / 5 | 2607 | 2579 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | |||||||||
11 | Ju, W. | 2.0 / 5 | 2548 | 2557 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | |||||||||
12 | Admiraal, M. | 1.0 / 5 | 2441 | 2379 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
13 | Abasov, N. | 1.0 / 5 | 2556 | 2370 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
14 | Haast, A. | 0.0 / 5 | 2391 | 1806 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Leave a Reply