It was a bit of a shock to find Anatoly Karpov at the bottom of the field in the San Sebastian tournament held this July in Spain. In fact, he managed only 1.5 points in this 10-round tournament. It is not clear whether age, illness, or just lack of preparation caused his poor performance. For surely Karpov is one of the greatest chess players ever. He is a former world champion who lost his title to Garry Kasparov in their second match. He needed only a draw in the last game of their 24-game match to hold his title, but missed a winning line and lost. In their third match, Karpov and Kasparov were tied going into the last game, but Kasparov won that game in a difficult ending. Now Karpov and Kasparov will meet once again in Valencia, Spain, this month to play 4 rapid and 8 blitz games. Karpov is not playing well and Kasparov has only been playing blitz games since his retirement in 2005.
The apparent tapering off of Karpov’s career has prompted us to take a look at his biography, “Karpov on Karpov,’’ published in 1990, which reveals a lot of information about chess at the top and chess in history. Karpov was born and brought up in a relatively poor but contented neighborhood. He learned chess from his father, whom he idolized. While often ill as a child, he fondly reviewed chess battles in his head. He attended Mikhail Botvinnik’s famed chess school, at which Botvinnik incorrectly predicted that Karpov would never be successful at chess. Karpov defied that opinion by beating all the students, apparently by displaying great stamina.
Karpov won the World Junior and became Bobby Fischer’s challenger for the World Championship in 1975 by defeating Lev Polugaevsky, Boris Spassky, and Viktor Korchnoi in successive matches. In the Korchnoi match, Karpov seemed stumped with the black pieces, but Botvinnik called him and made valuable suggestions. Karpov became world champion by the default when Fischer refused to play.
Karpov’s career was guided by Semyon Furman, who acted as a second father and coach in the world of chess. His death before the matches with Kasparov was a great blow to Karpov. First, however, Karpov had to survive two separate matches with Korchnoi. These matches were preceded by a verbal attack on Korchnoi by the former world champion, Tigran Petrosian, which Karpov did not join, that led to Korchnoi’s eventual defection from the Soviet Union in 1976. Also, Karpov discusses in detail his use of a psychologist in his first match against Korchnoi and Korchnoi’s use of a parapsychologist. The greatest interest in this work is Karpov’s explanation of his matches against Kasparov, but let’s see how Kasparov can maintain his plus 9 score in the avalanche of 169 tournament and match games (standard time control) in which both played.
Source: http://www.boston.com
Karpov is best. No excuses. No debate.
Kasparov won matches because he had the best opening preparation.
Karpov was a better over the board player, IMO.
I’d be interested in seeing them play a few games of Chess 960
No doubt Karpov is a great player but clearly Fischer much better! I mean even if you get their collected games and compare like opponents its fairly obvious.
Then why was Fischer afraid to play him?
Lets not forget to mention Kramnik, as FIDE and people try to do, as the third “K” and who is the only one to beat Kasparov in a match, not even Karpov did this, thus becoming a true world champion in line from Spassky to Fischer to Karpov to Kasparov to Kramnik.
What is all that fuss about Fischer being better or worse than Karpov? Fischer this, Fischer that… I’m honestly fed up with all that American talk about Fischer, who was just one of the many World Champions this world produced; I see no reason to have a constant talk about him and not about others. Also, he gave up his title as quickly as he gained it. Years 1972-1975 are long time gone now, chess has thoroughly changed since then… C’mon, don’t ride the sentimental past all the time!
“Fischer, who was just one of the many World Champions”
Not exactly one of many – he was the worst World Champion ever, having won 0 games as World champion. He can’t even be “surpased” in that category as worst ever.
“Not exactly one of many – he was the worst World Champion ever, having won 0 games as World champion. He can’t even be “surpased” in that category as worst ever.”
Actually he could be surpassed, as he didn’t lose or draw any games either. Though I doubt that anyone who gained the titled and managed to play after gaining it would fail to win or draw a game. You would have to give that person credit for at least trying though. 🙂